Tripping Over Starlight In the Dark

I hope readers found some enjoyment in my last post. Whether it was read as fact or fiction it can be adjudged as representative of an intense individual, pathological response to perceived reality. Why pathological? my answer to this question considers ethical contradictions by juxtaposing the idea of the "pencil experiment" with and while being aware of the "Don't touch the wheel" advisory, which strips impunity from any such action.

The pencil trick proceeds on the premise of a mechanical cause/effect relationship between manipulating any material element and an irresistible permanent altering of Universal Reality. It is impossible to avoid a valid comparison of this with any other consciously directed individual action, where a result (predictable or not) is expected. Though it seems there is a great proportional difference in the sphere of influence intended by these two cases, the truth or illusory nature of either is a question of the physics of consciousness expressed through material forms. Causal constants, however distant and temporary are sought and relied upon in the same way navigators once charted geographic position, viewing light received from astral emissions which had been traveling for eons; a perceptual differential, illusory yes, yet still having an essential utility that can be said to have greatly effected world history.

My interpretation of the caveat "Don't touch the wheel" has several distinct levels of significance. I only wish to consider one at this writing. This level of reason accepts the general notion that reality has its own unified mechanical laws, which are no more or less complex than they actually are and evolve to be. It accepts that consciousness exists in a progressive variety of subjective states represented by material conditions which have original consciousness as the starting point and extension of this
out growth. As the ego sentience of this also evolves and wishes to create its own condition(s), it by its own distinct seemingly separate nature finds itself to be at some odds with the in which universal reality transpires. My hit is that the 'wheel edict" (the Great Wheel) stipulates/suggests that motion of the unified field has a natural direction and that in fact must turn itself in accordance with the laws which accept the energy to do so. Actively, the efficiency and propriety of ego sentience must be of only a certain quality to be an acceptable motivating energy toward this top-drawer end. It amounts to being and becoming what we really are,the greatest ongoing challenge of discreet liberated individual spiritual participation on a universal scale, a self guiding constantly interactive principle.

Life on the wheel can be a darkness of subjective hells ,complicated by our positioning sense of ego identification as we become non-contributing slaves; or it can be a perfect congress of amazing supra-mechanical play, which causes intrinsic patterning to naturally evolve. In my final analysis, it is not the outward form of perceived actions that can be judged of greatest merit, but the inner spiritual performance (which is beyond judgement).

My Advice:"Don't touch the Great Wheel." If you are going to pick up the pencil, move our hand in a perfect fashion,and lay it to rest the same way. It is our natural right to be the wheel itself.

"Come see me sometime: Oh' how nice,you came so soon.", amazing,considering how long it has taken us to come this far!